"It seems evident that, if all the scenes of nature were continually shifted in such a manner that no two events bore any resemblance to each other, but every object was entirely new, without any similitude to whatever had been seen before, we should never, in that case, have attained the least idea of necessity, or of a connexion among these objects. "
If no 2 events in nature every bore any resemblance to each other, the idea of necessity shouldnt exsist is what Hume states. I don't agree with Hume because just the idea of no 2 events not having any details the same isn't possible and near improbable. Theres always something that you can relate an event to.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment